Tim Curran Logo

June 7, 2011

My first post on writing numbers for broadcast

Filed under: Journalism,Newswriting — Tags: numbers — by Tim Curran @ 9:05 am

How numbers are written out is one of the quickest ways to determine at a glance whether copy is intended for print/online or for broadcast. Numbers in broadcast scripts, in most cases, look nothing like those you’re used to reading on the page/screen, for the simple reason that the broadcast writer tries to relieve the news announcer of as much mental effort as possible, so she can concentrate on diction and performance. In short, you want to remove all the speed bumps that inhibit the anchor’s comprehension.

Also, spelling out numbers helps to get a more accurate time calculation from computerized word- or character-counting systems.

There are a few differences of opinion among broadcasters, but here’s my handy guide to spelling out numbers. They apply only to American-style broadcast writing.

In a nutshell, you are trying to transcribe the way the figure would be spoken aloud–within these parameters.

  • Spell out ‘one’ through ‘twenty.’
  • Use digits from ’21′ through ’999,’ except…
  • Spell out round numbers from ‘twenty’ through ‘ninety.’
  • Use the words ‘thousand,’ ‘million,’ ‘billion,’ etc. where they would be spoken: “four-million;” “21-thousand-450.”
  • For a conversational style–between 1,100 and 10,000–use the word ‘hundred’ where it would be spoken, especially for round numbers: “45-hundred;” “62-hundred-and-50.”
  • Don’t use a dollar sign ($), cent sign (ยข), or percent sign (%). Spell them out as they would be spoken: “six-million dollars;” “87 cents;” “sixty-percent.”
  • Don’t use a decimal point (.). Spell it out as it would be spoken: “62-point-five million.”
  • None of the above applies to years. Write them with Arabic numerals, as usual.
  • For ordinals (“first,” “53rd”) all the same rules apply, except of course you use the ordinal abbreviations (“st,” “nd,” “rd,” “th”) where they mix with Arabic numerals.

I’ll discuss the question of precision (i.e. how accurately to represent a lengthy number) in a future post.

Tweet
Share via email
Comments (0)

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Home

Résumé

Credits

Samples

Blog

FAQ

Contact

  • Link of the Week

    • 1857 'Pronouncing Vocabulary'
    • AP Broadcast Handbook
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Convert-Me
    • County Boundaries
    • Defamation Law
    • Easy FOIA requests
    • Economist Country Briefings
    • Election Guide
    • Electoral Map
    • Ethics AdviceLine
    • glbtq.com
    • Google News Sources
    • Google Translate
    • Grammar Topics
    • Great Britain terminology
    • Measuring Worth
    • Military Ranks
    • Newscript
    • OpenCongress
    • VOA Pronunciation Guide
    • WorldTimeServer
    • Yahoo! Currency Converter
    • Zoominfo
  • Friends

    • Common Mistakes
    • Lee Goldberg
  • Music

    • Jonathan Coulton
  • Gay

    • Dave Cullen
    • glbtq.com
  • Categories:
    • RSS Feed Icon Journalism
    • RSS Feed Icon Newswriting
    • RSS Feed Icon Comments (RSS)
    • RSS Feed Icon Posts (RSS)

  • Archives:
    • April 2013
    • April 2012
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • January 2009
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • April 2002
    • March 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • November 2001
    • October 2001
    • September 2001
    • August 2001
    • July 2001
    • June 2001
    • May 2001
  • Meta:
    • Log in
    • Valid XHTML
    • XFN
    • WP

Powered by WordPress